See what your company actually runs on
A written record of your systems, their costs, and where information gets entered more than once — without a single recommendation to replace anything.
Back to homeWhat you receive
At the end of three weeks, you will have a clear written picture of what your company is actually running on — not what the org chart assumes, but what staff are using day to day. You'll know what each system costs annually, who depends on it, and where the same information is quietly being typed in twice.
The situation it addresses
In companies of roughly twenty to two hundred people, the situation tends to arise the same way: tools were adopted department by department over several years, each one solving a real problem at the time, and nobody currently holds the full picture. Decisions about budget or replacement end up made on incomplete information, because gathering the complete picture takes time nobody has spare.
If that sounds familiar, the review is built for exactly this situation.
How the work runs
We conduct interviews with each function, asking not what software is officially in use but what people actually open every day. From those conversations we build a landscape report describing the current position as found, a dependency sheet setting each system against the processes and departments that rely on it, and a note on any duplications we come across.
Nothing in this stage recommends a change. The point is to establish a shared, accurate picture first.
What the three weeks look like
Over the three weeks, we schedule short interviews with each function at times that fit around their normal work. The conversation also gives people a chance to describe workarounds they have never had reason to mention to management. You are kept informed as the picture builds, rather than waiting until the final report to see anything.
Fee and scope
¥28,500
- · Interviews across each function
- · Written landscape report
- · Dependency sheet
- · Note on duplications found
How progress is shown
The interview-based method exists because surveys tend to record what people think they're supposed to say, while conversations surface what's actually happening. Progress is tracked simply: a running list of systems and interviews completed, shared with you as the review proceeds, so there are no surprises in the final document.
Next steps
Send a short note through the contact form describing your company's size and how many functions you'd want interviewed. We'll reply with a proposed schedule and confirm the scope before anything begins.